Jump to content

Rate the Unit, Day 7: Gordin


Recommended Posts

Dat Rules (borrowed/stolen from Integrity)

- Ratings are assumed to be on Hard 1 Mode.

- Votes need some explanation regarding their gameplay performance to be counted. If somebody else said what you want to already, quote them explicitly.

+/- ≤1 point extra regarding personality/appearance is encouraged, but no more. If you exercise your bias privileges, please do so explicitly. Also, if your vote is already a 10/10 or greater than 9 and you give a full point of bias, The score may not exceed 10!

- Numerical votes out of 10, or something proportional to it. Make it easy to calculate for my sake.

- Every ranking phase ends from 2100 to 2200 EST. Every ranking phase starts from 2200 EST to 2300 EST. Do the math if you are in another timezone!

- I will insist you do not use the "Not X" reason on any character, where X is another unit. If you do, your vote will be thrown out.

- "Recruits X" or "takes you to X chapter" arguments are explicitly banned. C'mon, people, this shouldn't need to be a rule. That's not gameplay performance.

- Assume that the character in question is being recruited.

- Similar to the "Recruits X" rule, do not use "He Comes with a Free Ridersbane" as an argument.

- Rate the character based on his/her performance without the Rainbow Potion, Maturity Drop or Bond Drop

- I withhold the privilege to tell you your rating is bogus and demand you revise it if it breaks any of the above. I will not throw out votes anonymously, you will be informed and given a chance to revise.

It's Gordin, That other Archer. He gets a 7/10 From me since his performance is mediocre!

Averages:

Cecil: 7.21

Ryan: 7.71

Rody: 8.43

Luke: 8.56

Marth: 8.70

My Unit: 9.99

Edited by *Narshen*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gordin is liek, Ryan but with worser growrhs. Liek, really, he has worser spd than Ryan, and I already said Ryan can get spd screwed. Gordin has lower growths compared to Ryan in every stat except Luck. Now Gordin has higher bases, which is all well and good, but- using him long-term isn't a very good idea. Bench him by C6/7 at the latest. He's just decent in H1, unfortunately.

5/10

Edited by Marth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

did this seriously get three votes

FUCK IT

DON'T EVEN CARE THAT IT'S TOO LATE

I'll say 8 counting full bias because he's fucking awesome and I know it's too late but I seriously don't care

His chip is damn fine, his speed's his only minor failing and frankly it's FE12 and you can do a WHOLE LOT FUCKING WORSE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did this seriously get three votes

FUCK IT

DON'T EVEN CARE THAT IT'S TOO LATE

I'll say 8 counting full bias because he's fucking awesome and I know it's too late but I seriously don't care

His chip is damn fine, his speed's his only minor failing and frankly it's FE12 and you can do a WHOLE LOT FUCKING WORSE

Well, on H1 archer/hunter speed is pretty important. Draug has no trouble doubling right off the bat while the Steel Bows kids do for a long while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely a setback, but either his base is high enough through hunter or his growth is high enough through archer. Or both, through sniper. He definitely has doubling troubles early on, but that's when his chip is at its most glorious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...