Do you have a point or something, I can't tell
At this point, it doesn't quite surprise me that you can't see the difference between mentioning something and debating something
Like in Belf -> Vergil - the kana doesn't support that -gil; ベルフ could be read as Verf, but the Vergil reading deviates in a way that isn't expressed in the kana
I don't think either of us like Belf -> Vergil.
I prefer Belve or Belves, myself.
Oh look, we're debating Vergil again. This isn't even funny anymore. Now it's just the sad continued beating of a dead horse. Let the horse rest in peace, Banzai.
Honestly for starters I don't even understand Arch's complaint. I guess two comments about Vergil suddenly make a debate. And I guess I'm the one who's beating the dead horse here, even though TheEnd was the one to start talking about Vergil without any provacation. And I guess TheEnd is merely mentioning Vergil, despite showing the Kana and giving a (cursory) explanation as to how it can and can not be interpreted, while I am "debating" Vergil by saying "I don't like Vergil."