I don't know about most people, but Ranger would need at least 2 movement to beat out the 1-2 range that hero offers, imo
Obviously GK vs. Pally is entirely different though.
The Short Bow is 1-2 so Rangers wouldn't need the movement boost.
Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:56 AM
I don't know about most people, but Ranger would need at least 2 movement to beat out the 1-2 range that hero offers, imo
Obviously GK vs. Pally is entirely different though.
Posted 15 May 2012 - 11:42 AM
The Short Bow is 1-2 so Rangers wouldn't need the movement boost.
Edited by Refa, 15 May 2012 - 11:42 AM.
Posted 15 May 2012 - 01:12 PM
Posted 15 May 2012 - 01:13 PM
Edited by Serious Bananas, 15 May 2012 - 05:02 PM.
Posted 15 May 2012 - 02:03 PM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:17 AM
And thank you Eclipse, that means a lot to me.If you want your faith in humanity raised, look at Crash's response. I don't have much to add about balancing, though. I want to see the current changes implemented before commenting further.
Edited by CrashGordon94, 05 June 2012 - 03:19 AM.
Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:19 AM
If you want your faith in humanity raised, look at Crash's response. I don't have much to add about balancing, though. I want to see the current changes implemented before commenting further.
Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:44 AM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 03:46 AM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 06:08 AM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 07:39 AM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:00 AM
Really? Because there aren't really that many changes to Crash's original ideas. In fact, the ideas that Integrity and Raymond hated oh so much are all still there, like infinite use dragonstones and nerfing Seth. Or giving Ewan and Amelia better bases.I wouldn't say that's ironic, because when Crash first posted this idea, it was pretty bad, so while the comments weren't warranted, they had a reason to be there
but Bladehero quoted me wrong, how do you do that, there's a quote button right there
Which ideas are these? Largely, the hack still seems to be a case of mainly, crashgordon taking FE8 and taking out minor stuff just because it bugs him plus some fairly obvious balance fixes. Which is fine, I guess. It's his hack, he can do what he likes, even if I don't think it's a good idea or is a waste of time.but now that people have offered ideas, and Crash has accepted them, this actually looks better. I dunno if I'd call it decent; I'd have to play it to know for sure, but it looks better, and doesn't deserve the flak it got when it was first posted. At least NOW it doesn't. So I dunno why Bladehero's rehashing all of what was said when this was started. Makes no sense to me.
Posted 05 June 2012 - 11:14 AM
Really? Because there aren't really that many changes to Crash's original ideas. In fact, the ideas that Integrity and Raymond hated oh so much are all still there, like infinite use dragonstones and nerfing Seth. Or giving Ewan and Amelia better bases.
Edited by Integrity, 05 June 2012 - 11:15 AM.
Posted 05 June 2012 - 08:59 PM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:24 PM
Edited by Tangerine, 05 June 2012 - 09:28 PM.
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:47 PM
Stupid accidental porn posts...! Right, I'll be good now.Just start handing out suspensions if it happens again, modslaves. And you're one warn away from being banned for good this time, Klok! If I were you I'd do my best to avoid making a fool of yourself, at least until some of your warns expire :P.
Posted 06 June 2012 - 04:09 AM
Sorry to grovel but please don't close this!What is wrong with you people in ROM Hacking? This is the second time in less than a week I've had to come in and put a stop to a fight. I hope I'm not being too lenient when I let this topic stay open if it gets back on topic immediately. Any more of this back and forth crap will receive warnings. I don't care which side it comes from.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users