Rate the Unit, Day 14: Darros
#1
Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:01 PM
- Ratings are assumed to be on Hard 2 Mode.
- Votes need some explanation regarding their gameplay performance to be counted. If somebody else said what you want to already, quote them explicitly.
+/- ≤1 point extra regarding personality/appearance is encouraged, but no more. If you exercise your bias privileges, please do so explicitly. Also, if your vote is already a 10/10 or greater than 9 and you give a full point of bias, The score may not exceed 10!
- Numerical votes out of 10, or something proportional to it. Make it easy to calculate for my sake.
- Each ranking phase ends from 2100 to 2200 EST. 13th May start the topic again but i am not sure. Do the math if you are in another timezone!
- I will insist you do not use the "Not X" reason on any character, where X is another unit. If you do, your vote will be thrown out.
- "Recruits X" or "takes you to X chapter" arguments are explicitly banned. C'mon, people, this shouldn't need to be a rule. That's not gameplay performance.
- Assume that the character in question is being recruited.
- Similar to the "Recruits X" rule, do not use "He Comes with a Free Ridersbane" as an argument.
- I withhold the privilege to tell you your rating is bogus and demand you revise it if it breaks any of the above. I will not throw out votes anonymously, you will be informed and given a chance to revise.
Averages:
Gordin: 3.11
Bord: 4.37
Cord: 4.87
Castor: 5.54
Wrys: 5.92
Marth: 6.33
Jagen: 6.98
Draug: 7.12
Ogma: 7.56
Abel: 8.76
Cain: 8.90
Barst: 9.40
Sheeda: 9.89
#2
Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:22 PM
"Everyone sucks, but not as much as Darros".
You look at Darros, and you realize "what a piece of shit I've been handed". His Spd growth is total ass (10% as a Pirate, 25% is the highest as a Hunter) and his Str growth is "okay". To make matters worse, his Spd base is 1 and he just seems all around mediocre... until you see his Def growth...
See, the funny thing is he has the highest Def growth of all the non-Sedgar / Wolf units, but let's face it: Armor Knights suck. E Lances suck, 5 Mov sucks, no real base stats sucks, being doubled sucks... pretty much the only way he redeems himself is through growths and a terrible class. 70% HP | 60% Def growth sounds cool, but let's be real to ourselves and remember that having 3 HP | 1 Def base isn't that cool. At least he has a little "utility" earlygame... but it isn't much.
tl;dr: Armor Knights suck, but not as much as Darros. He can't really function anywhere but this class, and they aren't even close to "good".
1.5/10
#3
Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:27 PM
3/10
#4
Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:30 PM
10/10
#5
Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:36 PM
Inferior to Folcore Blue
3.5
Edited by Elieson, 15 April 2012 - 08:38 PM.
#6
Posted 15 April 2012 - 09:04 PM
3/10
#7
Posted 15 April 2012 - 09:05 PM
2/10
#8
Posted 15 April 2012 - 09:17 PM
#9
Posted 15 April 2012 - 10:20 PM
Captain of the Meh squad. Pretty much meh stats and outright terrible speed. And has the lovely FE1/11 problem of being a cardboard personality wise.
2/10
*Applies negative bias *
1/10
#10
Posted 15 April 2012 - 10:21 PM
1/10
Edited by リンダ, 20 May 2012 - 07:49 AM.
#11
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:20 AM
5/10
#12
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:21 AM
#13
Posted 16 April 2012 - 02:28 AM
#14
Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:11 AM
#15
Posted 16 April 2012 - 06:15 AM
i don't understand how ayanami ranks every unit on HM lower than on NM
Easier to get them killed and enemies having better bases. .___.
#16
Posted 16 April 2012 - 06:27 AM
I just kill him for the first gaiden chapter to recruit Athena.
NM
3/10
HM
1/10
Try again please.
#17
Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
As a side note, he actually had 40% defense growth in FE1, as opposed to his 30% here. That was back when IS decided that fighters would have high defense. Now they have bad defense. At least they tend to get speed nowadays. Oh wait... except Darros.
BTW, Colonel M, I love that quote you included.
Edited by Flock of Geese, 17 April 2012 - 05:44 PM.
#18
Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:57 PM
#19
Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:02 PM
Oh no, a perpetual loop!Darros sucks but not as much as Darros 0/10
AAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
ON topic, somewhat:
Play FE12, Darros has much better speed there.As a side note, he actually had 40% defense growth in FE1, as opposed to his 30% here. That was back when IS decided that fighters would have high defense. Now they have bad defense. At least they tend to get speed nowadays. Oh wait... except Darros.
#20
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:26 PM
... but if everyone's getting weaker by pretty much the same then that means it's utterly pointless beyond removing like two points from a ten-point scale. Not to mention H2 is assumed anyway, so why even bother?Easier to get them killed and enemies having better bases. .___.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










