Bramimond's gender
#21
Posted 06 June 2012 - 03:43 AM
Also, point #3 in the OP doesn't really mean anything. Look at Lucius.
#22
Posted 06 June 2012 - 04:53 AM
#23
Posted 06 June 2012 - 06:40 PM
Besides, even going by looks doesn't support it 'cause he looks like a dude.
One other thing that occurred to me is that Limstella is apparently genderless (and besides the hair does appear somewhat androgynous, IMO). Nergal and Brammimond seem to have gone down somewhat similar paths, so I wonder if there's some kinda connection there...I don't really know what to make of it, though.
Edited by Hawkeye Hank Hatfield, 06 June 2012 - 06:45 PM.
#24
Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:34 AM
#25
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:04 PM
Wasnt Limstella actually an attempt by Nergal to make a morph out of his lost wife? But somehow, Limstella ended up without a gender? Thats what i thought.
So Brammimond shaves? Or the dark magic stopped his facial hair?
One other thing that occurred to me is that Limstella is apparently genderless (and besides the hair does appear somewhat androgynous, IMO). Nergal and Brammimond seem to have gone down somewhat similar paths, so I wonder if there's some kinda connection there...I don't really know what to make of it, though.
#26
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:12 PM
#27
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:15 PM
#28
Posted 07 June 2012 - 04:42 PM
Having no biological gender is not the same as being transgendered, a transvestite, or transsexual. Stop using words you don't understand.
Edited by Charlie, 07 June 2012 - 04:43 PM.
#29
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:27 PM
So what you're saying is that "one becoming the other" is the same as "being neither"? That metaphorically changing the channel on the television is the same as the metaphorical television never being on in the first place? Please, enlighten us as to the ways of your little world where these significantly different concepts are one and the same.People keep saying that but I find it hard to swallow, "no biological gender" just sounds like another kind of tranny to me in this context.
#30
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:59 PM
Well, for one, you should use an accurate term and not the ambiguous tranny. And even then, transsexual and transgender individuals aren't individuals lacking a sex.People keep saying that but I find it hard to swallow, "no biological gender" just sounds like another kind of tranny to me in this context.
There's a crag between what you're trying to define and what you're defining it with.
#31
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:04 PM
Limstella is not a "tranny", you twit. ~_~
Yeah, Crash, if you're going to even attempt to talk about transsexuals, could you not use offensive terms?
It's very hard for me to not rage at you right now.
The term most commonly applied to a genderless person is an Asexual person. A person who defines themselves as having no gender.
Edited by seph1212, 07 June 2012 - 10:12 PM.
#32
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:25 PM
Really? Even though asexuality has nothing to do with gender roles? At best one could try and use it to denote a sexless-state, but even then, a sex exists, and gender is a step away from sex altogether.The term most commonly applied to a genderless person is an Asexual person. A person who defines themselves as having no gender.
What Crash is most likely trying to grasp is a literal sexless entity, as in, no biological, material sex whatsoever.
#33
Posted 07 June 2012 - 10:27 PM
What Crash is most likely trying to grasp is a literal sexless entity, as in, no biological, material sex whatsoever.
Whatever he's grasping at, transsexual isn't the term he's looking for.
#34
Posted 07 June 2012 - 11:29 PM
#35
Posted 08 June 2012 - 02:51 AM
Pretty much. It's hard to put into words but it's basically "Tranny = Neither dude or chick" and "Genderless = Neither dude or chick" therefore "genderless = tranny".So what you're saying is that "one becoming the other" is the same as "being neither"? That metaphorically changing the channel on the television is the same as the metaphorical television never being on in the first place? Please, enlighten us as to the ways of your little world where these significantly different concepts are one and the same.
And it just doesn't seem very different to me AND genderlessness in human seems to be counted under the transgender "umbrella" (BTW, I'm not responsible for that particular point so so don't angry with me in specific over that point)
Not really. :/Well, for one, you should use an accurate term and not the ambiguous tranny.
Yeah, Crash, if you're going to even attempt to talk about transsexuals, could you not use offensive terms?
Nope, he's a dude.Bramimond, however, might be considered transsexual. And also androgynous.
#36
Posted 08 June 2012 - 02:54 AM
I got the sense that Brammimond was male. Nothing concrete, just a sense.
#37
Posted 08 June 2012 - 02:58 AM
In the most technical sense, I guess but ultimately that's how I see the result of such a change.That's not what tranny means, but I get the feeling that delving further will end badly.
#38
Posted 08 June 2012 - 04:07 AM
and what you see is completely, fundamentally incorrectIn the most technical sense, I guess but ultimately that's how I see the result of such a change.
#39
Posted 08 June 2012 - 04:14 AM
I believe the general catchall word is "genderqueer", but I don't keep up with the slang so I could be wrong.Pretty much. It's hard to put into words but it's basically "Tranny = Neither dude or chick" and "Genderless = Neither dude or chick" therefore "genderless = tranny".
And it just doesn't seem very different to me AND genderlessness in human seems to be counted under the transgender "umbrella" (BTW, I'm not responsible for that particular point so so don't angry with me in specific over that point)
Also, don't use that word, crash. It's rude.
#40
Posted 08 June 2012 - 04:36 AM
Yeah, that's the one I heard of actually.I believe the general catchall word is "genderqueer", but I don't keep up with the slang so I could be wrong.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










