Regarding Ike
#1
Posted 26 July 2012 - 12:34 PM
#2
Posted 26 July 2012 - 12:51 PM
#3
Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:29 PM
#4
Posted 26 July 2012 - 02:46 PM
#5
Posted 26 July 2012 - 02:51 PM
Edited by I don't play for turns, 26 July 2012 - 02:51 PM.
#6
Posted 26 July 2012 - 03:25 PM
#7
Posted 26 July 2012 - 03:33 PM
What are his flaws in FE9 again?Plus, he has no flaws in FE10 at all.
#8
Posted 26 July 2012 - 03:44 PM
Edited by NinjaMonkey, 26 July 2012 - 03:50 PM.
#9
Posted 26 July 2012 - 04:05 PM
Temporary flaw. Only exists to make him look better later on.
He's sword-locked in a game where the majority of enemies wield lancesHe's inexperienced as a leader (which is why Gatrie and Shinon abandon the mercs after Greil kicks the bucket),
No, he went to help Mist and Rolf because he just cares *so damn much* about his friends and family.he makes decisions without thinking (Chapter 2)... There's two to start off with!
#10
Posted 26 July 2012 - 04:08 PM
No, he went to help Mist and Rolf because he just cares *so damn much* about his friends and family.
And got himself reprimanded for it, by Greil, no less.
#11
Posted 26 July 2012 - 04:14 PM
Temporary flaw. Only exists to make him look better later on.
Wouldn't that logic would work on any protagonist who overcomes a weakness?
#12
Posted 26 July 2012 - 04:49 PM
They seem to fail to overlook the lack of development of almost all characters in RD. We already knew Ike from PoR, and he was no less developed than most other characters in RD, so I personally had no trouble with it.
certainly this. besides Micaiah, Sothe, and Elincia, there wasn't really any character development at all, which is relevant considering the size of the cast in this game.
besides, the point of the game wasn't so much on the characters themselves, but on the world and the war. this wasn't a tale about ike and his mercenaries or micaiah and the dawn brigade. it was about the nations just fighting each other and why it was stupid for them to do so, hence the multiple viewpoints.
and about Ike delivering the final blow. yes he did, but Micaiah was about as essential to that event as Ike was.
#13
Posted 26 July 2012 - 05:04 PM
I'd say that PoR Ike has his faults. Contrast his tolerance and acceptance of laguz with his hatred for the nobility (as a whole, since it seems like the few nobles he does like are the exception rather than the rule). He doesn't always - think - his actions through clearly and seems to have a bit of a "disdain" for the rules. He's loyal to a fault (and might have gotten himself killed over it in Begnion).
Also, I think Shinon and Gatrie leaving him in PoR does make him less Gary Stu. If he really was such a Gary Stu in PoR, then Shinon and Gatrie would probably have still stuck with him. Just showed that not everyone in-universe likes Ike. (And still doesn't.) The way he kept on pursuing revenge on the Black Knight should also be a "flaw". I mean, I understand he wants to avenge his father. But revenge is ... well, a terrible thing. It clouds your mind and fuels you with hatred. If Ike was a Gary Stu, then his motivation to kill the Black Knight would have been something more like, "because you are helping to bring about a dark age to Tellius, and you must be stopped" with no mention of "petty revenge".
That said, I do think FE10 Ike grew up a - bit - too much. But taking him and PoR Ike together into consideration, I have to say he's not a Gary Stu as a whole.
#14
Posted 26 July 2012 - 06:31 PM
He was a green boy when he actually took command of the company and suffered some potshots because of it? Two of the company's long runners abandoned him initially? He had to coax them to come back at different points of the game. The fact that Rolf and Astrid are the ones who bring those two back to the company speak a great deal about Ike's flaws in the eyes of those two characters. Not only that, Ike was a bit base and had to get chewed out a few times in FE9 in order to "get it". The biggest point was his whole meeting with Sanaki.What are his flaws in FE9 again?
All of that led to character development. He still has the latter flaw in FE10. (being a bit base at times) We see him rely almost entirely on Soren for most of the battle plans with the LA. It wasnt for a while that he finally started formulating some plans of his own. Sadly, this didnt lead to character development because FE10 was badly written in the latter parts of the plot.
Sothe got character development? Where? Micaiah didnt get much either. The only thing she learned is "hiding isnt the answer to my problems." Her other problems? Nah...not touched on. Elincia, Skrimir, and Pelleas got the most character development in the game. (Naesala got some too.) I chalk it up to bad writing. Micaiah wouldnt be a Sue if the writing wasnt so...half-assed. (so much potential there...wasted....)besides Micaiah, Sothe, and Elincia, there wasn't really any character development at all,
#15
Posted 26 July 2012 - 09:36 PM
He can't counter ranged weapons until 3-11. So there's that. He isn't even your best unit until part 4,(Haar) and even then you've got some people who you could say are better.(Tibarn, Nailah, Cain etc.)
#16
Posted 26 July 2012 - 11:12 PM
#17
Posted 26 July 2012 - 11:36 PM
#18
Posted 27 July 2012 - 12:04 AM
#19
Posted 27 July 2012 - 12:20 AM
I never understood how Ike was a Gary Stu, because there was always at least one party opposing him in both games. Whatever fame he got in FE10 was well deserved, because of the amount of shit he had to take in FE9.
I couldn't have said this better myself
#20
Posted 27 July 2012 - 04:54 AM
Ike: They're holding out longer than I expected.
Titania: Ike! Our forces on the western wall broke through the Daein defenses! They're requesting reinforcements. We should move our forces to the breach.
Ike: All right. I just hope we're able to keep Micaiah from doing anything rash. All units, to the western wall!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








