• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BBM

  1. What if Sigurd had a daughter?

    ehhh a lot of the holy blood stuff is like more a norm than the hard-and-fast rule? like the Hezul blood got passed down through a younger daughter to Eltshan's family iirc so while Cellica female Seliph might inherit major Naga, there's no reason that she couldn't inherit major Baldo as well if that was more convenient for the story.
  2. SF Interviews 2.0 - KnightOfNohr

    why do you use so many anime girls for your avatar? how come you haven't changed your display name ever? (afaicr; can't figure out how to check display name history gg)
  3. town definitely threw the game, but they didn't throw it on this day phase lol. they could have technically won the game on a no lynch but doing so would have required an even larger throw from you/kts.
  4. maybe tomorrow people can talk about why my cases show scum intent as opposed to people just disagreeing with them
  5. ##Unvote, ##Vote: Junko to break the tie i guess
  6. that's a fair criticism and i don't have time to check how late into d1 she was doing it. but there's a lot more to my case like her response to pressure, and her stance on junko.
  7. @Zkirsche can you guys pick a new pair to co-network every night or is it just once?
  8. the difference is that driver would be really useless for town if one person controlling it was scum. or yeah they were both scum like refa said. networker can still be useful for both town and scum even if the people controlling it are diff alignments. the difference is that i was not looking for bad play over scummy play and eclipse is. half of my content isn't based on pushing new players to give content like eclipse's is. i haven't avoided responding to cases on me like eclipse has.
  9. tunneling is suspicious bc it means the person may not be capable of making more than one case. whether that case was on town or scum is not really as relevant because people can be wrong. this is not a 1v1. lynch kirsche if you find him the scummiest, don't lynch him just because you now think junko is town
  10. yeah my agenda is lynching the people I find scummiest. having no agenda means you're just playing aimlessly, which probably means you don't care who gets lynched, which is scummy. assuming that junko can only target the same dead person once (which is how I have always seen amnesiac/gravedigger implemented), this is a strictly null claim. I can literally link role PMs of me having this role as both town and scum. it's also not a role like mack's which will just get itself killed as town. i still don't understand this 1v1 people are setting up between kirsche and junko and why people want to default to kirsche over eclipse if they don't want to lynch junko. if kirsche gets lynched and flips town, what extra info are you getting on junko? just that he was wrong. two people tunneling each other all game doesn't give you anything beyond that with regards to the others alignment if one gets lynched. the most informative interactions are when people change their opinions on things, and by definition that doesn't exist in a tunneling interaction.
  11. also wait wait do you target living people? i assumed you could only target dead people
  12. wait junko can you use the same role more than once?
  13. that role is more commonly known as gravedigger. claim doesn't really change my opinion on junko's alignment. i've been both town and scum gravedigger. forcing 1v1s for non-role reasons is something that I really dislike because it's basically lining up lynches. you can get two people lynched on consecutive days for the price of one case, and like 5 people are doing it, which is very frustrating because i can't even scumread anyone for it
  14. i would lynch junko over kirsche but I'm just really uncomfortable with this 1v1 people are making out of it. i've seen a lot of town vs town tunneling instances. and kirsche is someone who we all KNOW tunnels. i fundamentally disagree with the premise that one of them has to be scum because of how much they've been focusing on each other.
  15. do you pick one dead role and become that role for the rest of the game or do you get to use each role as a 1x ability?
  16. i was scumreading jb for a good portion of d1 and d2 but his response under pressure seemed pretty decent? that's something i've been struggling with where I feel like the people I've pushed have responded in a good way. i don't think eclipse really did though, it felt like she kind of avoided answering a lot of questions. especially the ones makaze asked; once or twice she was basically like "i'll decide whether or not I want to respond to you" which is just ???. part of mafia is that you agree to respond to cases people make against you unless you think they're making them in bad faith. she also made it seem like he was scummy just for casing her.
  17. i'm not going to case only weak players just because I might be wrong. then only weak players would get lynched. ugh I don't really want to lynch kirsche. do you guys really find junko subbing back in to be such a strong argument that you're basically willing to lynch anyone else? because that's what it seems like to me based on switching to eclipse and now kirsche
  18. I'm good with voting Eclipse bc I find her scummier but i don't really think that the atgument that junko wouldn't sub back in as scum is good? He probably just felt really bad. Plus even though i enjoy town more i think I'd be more likely to sub back in as mafia because i would feel bad screwing over my teammates. ##Unvote, ##Vote: Eclipse
  19. Oh must have missed that. I'm not faulting eclipse for not having a lot of reads. It just feels more like a lot more of her game has been based on pushing people without any content than it normally is. And her fixation on tone changes seems over the top
  20. Rip i woke up late and have to leave almoat right away. Why are people waiting for junko to claim when he subbed out? His sub subbed out too so... Did I miss something?
  21. anyways i'm off for the night, I should be around tomorrow morning for a little while but unfortunately i won't be here for phase end, or if i am it'll be with less than 30 minutes left
  22. to elaborate a bit, it feels with junko that the main thing you're using to balance out the suspicious things junko did is that he's explained himself better than kirsche. i don't really see that as the case at all so it feels really weak. actually, thinking you two might be buddies now, as opposed to what I said in the last post about you pushing for a mislynch without tying yourself to the wagon. that makes more sense, although i'm not putting a ton of stock into that reading of it without a scum flip from one of you
  23. ehhh I think I'll probably keep shinori in the leaning town pile. I think his d1 was pretty good and i thought he had some pretty good points on bartozio early on and nightmare later. i think his start to d2 was kind of weak because he didn't really talk much about his reads but he clarified them later and they seem reasonable. i don't quite like his auto "scumread everyone finding bibbon suspicious" but that's relatively minor. @Snike- honestly I forgot about eclipse's rvs case; i kinda skipped over rvs when rereading her (and everyone else's) posts. i agree that it doesn't really fit the pattern of the rest of her play but I think coming up with those kinds of rvs scum intent cases is a lot easier than doing it later in the game, because later on as scum you have to start actively ignoring townie things that people are doing. so I don't give the rvs stuff as much importance. my big mafia-related takeaway was that I didn't like it because it seemed like you came up with plenty of good reasons to find junko suspicious (non-evolving reads, misrep on kirsche, tunneling), and yet still ended up at a null read on him. it feels like you're pushing the wagon while trying not to tie yourself to it. just not sure if i'm confirmation biasing because although it's scummy it doesn't quite fit the type of scummy you've been so far. my big non-mafia-related takeaway was that you got a migraine from a stomach ache and that sounds like a bad time. interested to see what your read on omega is. i feel like your reads post before you started the big kirsche/junko reread was less a reads post and more of a "this is what I remember about these people" post. you said that athena "was" the scummiest person. what's your current read on him?