GenericZero

I never heard any of these since I've had map animations only while I've been playing. I like Kliff saying "Don't push me."

Some of the units I like the most in no particular order: Serra, had great stats and wiped out enemy forces. Hector for being a great axe-wielder and I actually like his personality. I always used Lethe for the high speed stat and design. Sirius in Mystery of the Emblem was a great unit with his growth rates and I liked his masked design. Marcus in FE7, you always have to appreciate those early game paladins they give. Ephraim, but that's because I always took his route in FE8 and liked that he was a spear locked lord.

One stat level ups on characters with decent growth rates. The weight system becoming redundant with physical units later in the game in Path of Radiance. Same turn reinforcements in the games that have them. Also I tend to stockpile all my good weapons while still using iron and steel, so that's my fault. At least Fates made it easier by making iron weapons the ones you use in general. Yeah, I vote Ryoma for the most ridiculous hair award in Fates. I looked at it again and it's a literal mess.

Hey, they did pretty good out of all the virtual console titles in Japan. Maybe that might influence them to do a Binding Blade remake and see how it does with a western release.

I have not played Shadows of shadow of Valentia yet, so I can't comment on that, but I feel like remakes should be something like New Mystery of the Emblem. Adding gameplay features and updating graphics are what I expect of a remake. However, even though I enjoyed Shadow Dragon a good amount, they didn't exactly change much when they could have. I can agree with that. If people didn't like it in the first release, then you can fix it in the remake. As long as it isn't changed too drastically, it should improve the core experience of the game.

I could see Binding Blade getting a remake. It never got an english release and most people think it hasn't aged as well as FE7. I believe they're aiming to re-do the games that haven't gotten western releases, making the SNES Fire Emblem games a high priority too.

I don't think it would necessarily help the writing to make the conflicts smaller. Really, it would help to make the villains and the characters more ambiguous in their roles. We need less good/bad sides, since not everything in war is clear-cut. In most of the games the main enemy just tends to be an external force at the end and it gets rid of what the plot was building up to for the game.

My Hector on my last HHM playthrough of the game maxed out Strength, Skill, and Speed. He got slightly higher offensive stats than average, considering he didn't hit level 20. All I used was one Speedwing on him, to make sure he would double. Unfortunately, his defense was below average though.

I like the idea of having super bosses as little challenges throughout. Additional enemies could add a small amount of difficulty too.

Fire emblem Fates Conquest has great gameplay even compared to the rest of the series. I played Revelations, and I thought the gameplay was a good amount worse. Both stories were pretty bad, but it's a fun game to play and buy. It's probably worth to pick it up over Shadows of Valentia.

I would prefer a remake of FE6 before blazing blade because there hasn't been an offical American release of Binding Blade. A remake might get more people to see the game.

Hey. I've played quite a bit of fire emblem. I want to talk about it and have some fun with it. I've finished Fire Emblem 7, 8, 9 10, 11, 13, and 14. I'm going to try to finish up Fire emblem 12 and play genealogy of the holy war when I to have some free time.