Congratulations. You have successfully kicked a person in the balls, then beat them to death before they were able to raise an arm in defense. Happy?
Moving on, let's assume we have two skilled players of equal level, but one can rng abuse. Who wins? I think you know the answer here.
And Horace did say (first page of this thread) he rigged crits, which is RNG abuse. We all know he's a very skilled drafter that probably doesn't need to rng. Except he said that he did. I'm not in anyway saying OMG YOU NEED TO RNG TO DO WELL IN DRAFTS. I'm just interested in how well a person does in drafts with or without rnging.
And no, remember your words might sound very clear to yourself in your head, but this does not mean they will translate well over the internet.
Also I just checked through all the posts, and I see no proof shown that said event happened in your lifetime (aside from the hack you admitted to performing)
First, I assume you don't mean the Hall of Fame, since as you implied, a skilled drafter doesn't need a favorable RNG to do well.
Next, we are penalizing people for getting insanely lucky because there is a much higher chance of a person RNG abusing (since it is much faster, so burns through the probability events faster) over a given period of time.
Why am I even bothering to answer this, obviously my idea is worthless.