Deva Ashera

Member
  • Content count

    236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Deva Ashera

  • Rank
    Do You Like Darkness?
  • Birthday 05/24/88

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female

Previous Fields

  • Favorite Fire Emblem Game
    Awakening

Member Badge

  • Members
    Camilla

Allegiance

  • I fight for...
    Nohr
  1. Hints at what is in Warriors DLC & plans

    The game only just released. When Hyrule Warriors released in Japan, they announced the DLC Season Pass/Packs first and then a week or two later announced that Cia, Volga, and Wizzro would be a free update. Its also likely they didn't say anything about Navarre, Owain, Niles, Oboro, etc yet because, technically, we weren't supposed to know they were in the game until after release and people played through the story. I expect we'll hear something nearing the NA/EU releases similarly to Hyrule Warriors.
  2. Hints at what is in Warriors DLC & plans

    The wording they used seemed more akin to them debating on whether or not to include Lucina, not that they were against including her. They never even said that they chose not to. It seemed more like Nintendo was the deciding factor. I don't think Koei would tiptoe around this, they outright said Aonuma, the director of the Zelda series, told them not to use Tingle when they had planned to in the base game, even if he eventually became DLC. Trust me, the possibility still existed..outside of the given characters (Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf) none of my favs made it in the base game. OoT Favs: Saria, Malon (I know, odd choice, but Agitha made it), Nabooru, TP Fav: Ashei, SS Fav: Groose. It wasn't until DLC that I got some non-core favs in with Young Link/Fierce Deity, Medli, and Marin..though no Hilda :C Agitha was a..polarizing..choice to say the least considering you can go through all of Twilight Princess and never meet her while the demand for Groose from Skyward Sword was high and yet never came to be. Why do you feel like that? They didn't charge us for the OC NPC villains in Hyrule Warriors or even Medli in Hyrule Warriors Legends, who I still theorize was meant for base game but didn't get finished in time. I mean, anything is possible, but I don't think they'll charge for characters mostly already in the game.
  3. Why are individual characters so important?

    As has been said, this game isn't doing anything Hyrule Warriors didn't do..with the exception of Lyn & Celica. The focus is on three games. Ocarina of Time, Twilight Princess, and Skyward Sword for Hyrule Warriors, Shadow Dragon, Awakening, and Fates for Fire Emblem Warriors. The game has an imbalanced roster. In Hyrule Warriors we had 2 OoT, 3 TP, and 2 SS (originally 2 OoT, 2 TP, 1 SS until Zant & Ghirahim were made playable last minute). I don't feel like counting representation of Fire Emblem Warriors, but we all know it's imbalanced, though more noticeable due to its larger roster. A large portion of the games is ignored, character-wise, due to 3 game focus. Even adding Legends + DLC, some games with usable characters were ignored, notably Link to the Past (Aghanim), Oracles (Din, Nayru, Onyx, Veran), Minish Cap (Vaati), and Phantom Hourglass (Linebeck)..and the Groose is still not Loose (Skyward Sword). This is similar to Fire Emblem Warriors exclusions. First Round DLC focuses on core 3 games..more or less. In Hyrule Warriors, most DLC was tied to the base games, with exception to the Termina Pack adding Young Link & Tingle, which was still a direct sequel to Ocarina of Time and Tingle was intended to be the Lyn/Celica of Hyrule Warriors until Aonuma told Koei not to use him in the base game thus making him DLC. We didn't get characters from completely unrelated games until Wind Waker in base Legends and it's DLC packs. I also feel like the devs wanting to wait for a Fire Emblem Warriors 2 to include characters like Ike and Roy could be that they want to give them the importance they deserve. Otherwise I fail to see any logical reason for not making them DLC that would definitely make bank.
  4. FE Warriors DLC

    Yeah, when people say what was included, it doesn't sound like a lot, but those of us that got them know otherwise, the characters, weapons, and costumes were great, but they also had a crap ton of stuff to do in each adventure map, including new weapon levels to unlock (like 8bit versions) and new alternative colours which tended to reference other Zelda characters or previous alt colours (like Purple Link or Hilda for Zelda) along with just new challenges to undertake. Its funny just how much mileage re-used maps can get when new scenarios and missions are implemented. I also suspect Fire Emblem Warriors will offer more new characters then Hyrule Warriors did previously.
  5. FE Warriors DLC

    I'm optimistic about the DLC. Hyrule Warriors & Hyrule Warriors Legends DLC Season Passes were $20 too and both offered a ton of content..so I'm sure I'll be content with what's offered.
  6. Only on New Nintendo 3DS. Switch has local co-op.
  7. FE Warriors DLC

    DLC, especially in Japanese games, tend to be announced early on. Fact is it won't be shown off until later, probably is nowhere near finished, etc. Also, as was said, games are completely finished months, at least 2 months, ahead of release to make time to burn discs or make carts, print case paper, manuals, etc. DLC is also used to help recoup costs so as to not have to charge even more for games. Beyond that, DLC tends to have a budget completely separate from the main game it's for. Tecmo Koei could also still release free update DLC like they did with Hyrule Warriors to add the OC villains, Link's classic costume, and Medli into the game. I also feel that feeling you were personally insulted/flipped off is a bit too emotional a reaction to anything like this. Yes, it sucks those classic characters weren't include..yet..but that's all.
  8. Stay updated or stay away?

    I just want to know any possible remaining characters in the game.
  9. FE Warriors at TGS

    Yup, I feel the same way. People like to throw around 'slap in the face' or 'insult' too much when it's really not at all the intention and more how they took news or information that they simply didn't like or agree with. I feel like people take things too personally or react too emotionally about rather inconsequential things. You can say it sucks or disagree with a decision but it's far from a personal slight. I also know what you have to deal with here, I used to be a Global Moderator on Capcom's Official Forums, Capcom-Unity, between the announcements of Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3 and Marvel vs Capcom Infinite..the timeframe being everyone being pissed at their DLC practices, lack of Mega Man in MvC, cancellation of Mega Man Legends 3, lack of Mega Man games, and DmC with the bad Dante design...I hope you at least haven't gotten death threats lol
  10. How Warriors Should Have Decided Characters

    Unpopular opinion, but even with the current lack of Tharja and Azura, I've never had a single issue with the roster. Yes, it is sword heavy, but I don't really care if I have fun playing them. With what I've seen here along with parts of Hyrule Warriors, the spiral of negativity was unavoidable. Fire Emblem as a series is too huge to not have many exclusions that would rub people the wrong way. Even including almost everything like with Heroes will garner negativity with accusations of shallow portrayals or supposed pandering. I do, however, believing most complaints are from a more vocal minority, even if I believe some are valid or I can see where they are coming from. I'm hoping for a Lyn amiibo too, as well as ones for other characters that don't currently have any figure-based merchandise. They didn't say they didn't want to, they said they were close to not including her due to being another Falchion user and a child generation character. However, she's also one of the three main characters of Awakening and popular so I think it was the right move to include her. Owain is great, yes, but he's not particularly important to the game whereas he has more importance in Fates, so I expect we'll see Odin Dark appear in the Fates DLC pack with other Retainers hopefully..possibly with a costume of his Owain appearance.
  11. FE Warriors DLC

    Hmm..that would be a pretty smart use of History Mode, unlocking units like Tharja or Gaius on recreations of the maps in Awakening where you originally recruited them.
  12. FE Warriors DLC

    Yeah, I think Bride Lucina is a step-up from Dark Link and a more iconic costume for her/her game due to its appearances in Project x Zone 2 and Bride Cordelia in Heroes since her other iconic one, Great Lord, is probably in the game as a Class Up costume. It's better then Dark Link in Hyrule Warriors but not as good as Wind Waker Robes Ganondorf in Hyrule Warriors Legends..but it's also for a character I love so I'm happy. Classic no-pants Marth may get in still similar to Classic Link in Hyrule Warriors. They probably add a sheath like they do when using a Sword Weapon for Link in Hyrule Warriors and just don't show it on the render. Each sword you can equip to Lucina likely has its own sheath.
  13. Like with Hyrule Warriors, it's all down to if there is demand to play as them. It's what got Ghirahim and Zant into the base game and Cia, Volga, and Wizzro as a Free Update. I don't see much demand for Validar, but maybe if some other, more popular villains appear in history mode or the story's ones are interesting enough, there may be.
  14. FE Warriors DLC

    I'm still fine with this, it may get me Tharja, Oboro, Setsuna, Arthur, the Whitewings, Minerva, etc. They can do the three theme games now and then add more DLC or do a sequel with more games and a bigger focus on them later.
  15. Azura deconfirmed

    True enough..I guess I'm just happy with X, Zero (even if I prefer Zero ver), Morrigan, Chun-Li, Dante, and now Monster Hunter. I also know I'll never get Psylocke back now..