Tino Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Hell yeah! Based of off Swordsalmon's list, but with a few changes here and there. Top: Seth Moulder Franz Colm Vanessa High: Ephraim (Ephraim) Lute Artur Duessel (Ephraim) Cormag (Ephraim) Erika (Erika) Gerik (Erika) Forde Natasha Tethys Kyle Mid: Garcia Neimi Joshua Gilliam Ross Saleh (Erika) Tana Gerik (Ephraim) Innes (Erika) Erika (Ephraim) Cormag (Erika) Amelia Marisa (Erika) L'Arachel Ephraim (Erika) Duessel (Erika) Low: Rennac Saleh (Ephraim) Innes (Ephraim) Myrhh Marisa (Ephraim) Bottom: Syrene Knoll Ewan Discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Tana's a better Peg. Knight than Vannesa; I'm pretty sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Judy Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Tana's a better Peg. Knight than Vannesa; I'm pretty sure. Yeah, though I think Tana is a better Wyern knight, than a Flackonknight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 I'm sure she's not. She joins later, with no weapons at all, and with worse supports. And don't come with her 20/20 stats being better, because that doesn't matter at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 I think Eirika (Eirika) and Tethys need to be raised a bit. Eirika is doing excellently on her own route and is fairly durable with Seth A. Tethys is Gerik's best support option and Dancer utility is just great. <3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Judy Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 I'm sure she's not. She joins later, with no weapons at all, and with worse supports. And don't come with her 20/20 stats being better, because that doesn't matter at all. Then I don't see much point arguing here *leaves* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Fine, jeez. What about Gerik (Eirika)? He comes with a Steel Blade, is able to hold his own, and let's not even get started on his supports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 Eirika is doing excellently on her own route and is fairly durable with Seth A. You have a point. She has promotion problems, though, and being locked to swords also ain't cool. Tethys is Gerik's best support option and Dancer utility is just great. And 5 movement on big maps is fail. Then I don't see much point arguing here Then you don't see what real debating is. What about Gerik (Eirika)? He comes with a Steel Blade, is able to hold his own, and let's not even get started on his supports. Um... he's mid of high? He is pretty slow, and his supports are actually pretty shaky. Tethys isn't always near him because of her dancer utility and Ross is just a B support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 You have a point. She has promotion problems, though, and being locked to swords also ain't cool.And 5 movement on big maps is fail. Then you don't see what real debating is. Um... he's mid of high? He is pretty slow, and his supports are actually pretty shaky. Tethys isn't always near him because of her dancer utility and Ross is just a B support. Huh. My Gerik's have always been speed-blessed, then. They dodged just about everything, but whatever. You're all about PEMN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 It's not like he can't double anything, but he has some minor doubling issues against the faster enemies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Just a quick question. Why is Joshua in the Mid tier? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 (edited) Mono-swords, not so great supports, only decent stats... Joshua is massively overrated. Edited September 14, 2008 by Tino Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehab Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 It's Sacred Stones. Who cares. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tino Posted September 14, 2008 Author Share Posted September 14, 2008 It's Sacred Stones. Who cares. About what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehab Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 -It's not hard to beat the game. At all. A tier list might tell somebody which characters are worth using to make the game easier, but it's an easy game, so who cares. Not needed. -There aren't any rankings in the game. No reward for doing "better" according to any standards the game throws at you. A tier list might help you for trying to get a good rank in the games that have ranks, but no ranks, so it doesn't do that. Who cares. -Who cares about a tier list for SS? It's pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 You have a point. She has promotion problems, though, and being locked to swords also ain't cool.And 5 movement on big maps is fail. Then you don't see what real debating is. Um... he's mid of high? He is pretty slow, and his supports are actually pretty shaky. Tethys isn't always near him because of her dancer utility and Ross is just a B support. Oh yeah, I forgot about the promotion... Nevermind. ^_^ True, but it's doubtful everyone's using their full Movement a turn, and Tethys is the best candidate for the Boots. I do think Gerik's in a perfect place. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meteor Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 It's not pointless; it gives us something to argue about! ^_^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Envoy of the Beginning Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 -It's not hard to beat the game. At all. A tier list might tell somebody which characters are worth using to make the game easier, but it's an easy game, so who cares. Not needed.-There aren't any rankings in the game. No reward for doing "better" according to any standards the game throws at you. A tier list might help you for trying to get a good rank in the games that have ranks, but no ranks, so it doesn't do that. Who cares. -Who cares about a tier list for SS? It's pointless. Agreed. It's not pointless; it gives us something to argue about! ^_^ Cause arguing is always a great thing to do [/sarcasm] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Tier lists in a single player game. /joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted September 14, 2008 Share Posted September 14, 2008 Look, I know that you guys don't like tier lists. I'm not partial of them either. Can't we just stay on topic and humor the guy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Changed by VASM :( Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Fire Emblem and Tier Lists do not mix at all. It depends on how well you level people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom103 Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 I thought you guys hated tiers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Fire Emblem and Tier Lists do not mix at all.It depends on how well you level people. Why not? Fire Emblem is pretty simple to debat anyways, since it all goes down to who's benefitting the team most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florete Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Why not? Fire Emblem is pretty simple to debat anyways, since it all goes down to who's benefitting the team most. It's a single player game, that's why. You don't raise a team to fight RL opponents, so this kind of debate is pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 It's a single player game, that's why. You don't raise a team to fight RL opponents, so this kind of debate is pointless. You can debate anything, though. There's a set of characters, some good and some not. That's enough to debate Fire Emblem, regardless if one player plays it? :o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.