Jump to content

Las Vegas Shooting


Captain Karnage
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just because you're not diagnosed with a mental illness doesn't mean you don't have one - especially when you get over the age of 60.  The story fits better than any crazy conspiracy theories people are trying to come up with.  His girlfriend said his mental state was declining.  His neighbors said he was extremely anti-social.  His family said he was very introverted. 

Why the hell is everyone so against the fact that a mental illness can cause people to go crazy?  It happens all the time.  Is this just one of those things where we avoid the truth because we don't want to upset anyone?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lushen said:

Just because you're not diagnosed with a mental illness doesn't mean you don't have one - especially when you get over the age of 60.  The story fits better than any crazy conspiracy theories people are trying to come up with.  His girlfriend said his mental state was declining.  His neighbors said he was extremely anti-social.  His family said he was very introverted. 

Why the hell is everyone so against the fact that a mental illness can cause people to go crazy?  It happens all the time.  Is this just one of those things where we avoid the truth because we don't want to upset anyone?  

Did you read the post directly above yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lushen said:

Yes.  Which is why I said that just because it's not diagnosed doesn't mean it's not present. 

Do disagree with the logic presented in that post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Lushen said:

Why the hell is everyone so against the fact that a mental illness can cause people to go crazy?

- stigma. it can get quickly out of hand by mental illness hysteria; they already have ISIS hysteria, so imagine being stigmatized for any mental illness (including depression). it's already pretty fucking bad, don't get me wrong, but it's going to actively make it worse.

- point 2: "Blaming it on unspecified 'mental illness is a cop out to avoid talking about/understanding any of the other motives shooters have." - @Res

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eclipse said:

Do disagree with the logic presented in that post?

I'm sure mental illness is used as a cop-out occasionally.  But I disagree that it should be thrown out as an impossibility in this case.  I even think the article mentioned quite a few cases where it was used in court to get the killer a reduced sentence.  However, these individuals had a clear motive - such as hatred for a specific demographic that caused them to target said demographic.  In this case, the shooter didn't really have a motive other than to kill as many people as possible.  Unless a motive is determined, I don't see how it could be anything but a declined mental state.  I have a family member with a mental illness and she is incredibly violent without medicine.  Yes, mental illness alone cannot cause you to be a murderer and not all mental illnesses make you more violent, but some make you considerably more violent or react significantly more aggressively than normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lushen said:

Unless a motive is determined, I don't see how it could be anything but a declined mental state.  I have a family member with a mental illness and she is incredibly violent without medicine.

depression is a mental illness. you don't want to go down this route.

regardless, why not wait until the facts come out? that's pretty much the point that we are making that you seem to be missing.

Edited by Lord Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lord Raven said:

depression is a mental illness. you don't want to go down this route.

regardless, why not wait until the facts come out? that's pretty much the point.

I encourage waiting for the facts to come out.  I just didn't like how people seemed to be dismissing mental illness like it's, for some reason, not a valid reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why it cannot be multiple factors. I'd say mental illness is an often stigmatised issue in the US and other countries, and deserves to be given more attention to.

At the same time, you don't just say "mental illness, that's it, nothing we could do." If these things are ever to be addressed it is likely they will require a multiple pronged approach.

Edited by Tryhard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lushen said:

I encourage waiting for the facts to come out.  I just didn't like how people seemed to be dismissing mental illness like it's, for some reason, not a valid reason.

the people in this thread that are telling you to hop off the mental illness accusation did not make any speculative posts about potential motive. most of this thread was about gun control and how it's likely not ISIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sorta goes back to the point I made in the thread that popped up after the terrorist attacks in Manchester arena.

But you will never, ever, ever, ever, ever see the Lushen's of the world pipe in with "...well the guy was obviously mentally ill..."   ater a jihadist attack.

And this should go without saying. But we can imagine how radically different his response and the response of Trump and co. would be under  the same set of facts...only except instead of Stephen Paddock, the shooters name is Abdul Al-Wahim. And he's a first-generation immigrant.

Then--ohhhhhhhh, lord have mercy--we'd be hearing nonstop how unacceptable it is that something like this could happen in America. How we can never allow something like this to happen again. How we immediately need to change our laws and our policies, and you don't care about keeping Americans safe if you don't support "common sense laws" against gun violence immigrants and refugees.

...but the attacker is Stephen Paddock...

So its all good. This is just "the price of freedom." Theres nothing we can do; you can't prove that any law would have stopped this from happening. Attacks like this are just a part of living in a free country. And if you don't get that, you're trying to exploit a tragedy for political gain.

...that's that subtle racism we keep talking about.

 

Edited by Shoblongoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, fartboi said:

it's reductive, dismissive, misinformed, baseless speculation.

So, terrorism? The Manchester bridge attack had nothing to do with terror, and yet it was immediately labeled such. Which one scares people more? Someone who lost it due to (most of the time) no fault of their own? Or a fanatic who instills nothing but fear and hatred for his cause by targeting innocent people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Res said:

He didn't 'just lose it'. This was apparently months in the planning.

San Bernadino was planned in minutes. Pre-meditation is not always a cornerstone of terrorism, nor does a terrorist attack require any sort of planning (Nice was a good example of that.) Being able to plan and calculate does not mean, at least in criminal law, sanity. The Joker is a good example of this, especially in the 90s cartoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hylian Air Force said:

So, terrorism? The Manchester bridge attack had nothing to do with terror, and yet it was immediately labeled such. Which one scares people more? Someone who lost it due to (most of the time) no fault of their own? Or a fanatic who instills nothing but fear and hatred for his cause by targeting innocent people?

Is anyone in this thread calling him a terrorist?

actually let me back up: HFA, I have no idea how what you said had anything to do with what stolypin said.

1 hour ago, hanhnn said:

I think "mass shooting" is kind of a feature in US.

When you get so bored, you can try to kill as many people as you can.

You can't do that elsewhere, US is the only country that can allow you to do it with free will.

I don't know what you're trying to say either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hylian Air Force said:

San Bernadino was planned in minutes. Pre-meditation is not always a cornerstone of terrorism, nor does a terrorist attack require any sort of planning (Nice was a good example of that.) Being able to plan and calculate does not mean, at least in criminal law, sanity. The Joker is a good example of this, especially in the 90s cartoon.

Getting a hotel room in the middle of a giant music fest requires a lot of foresight.  Those things tend to go like hotcakes.  This definitely wasn't a spur-of-the-moment attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, eclipse said:

Getting a hotel room in the middle of a giant music fest requires a lot of foresight.  Those things tend to go like hotcakes.  This definitely wasn't a spur-of-the-moment attack.

Additionally, there were notes found in the room calculating trajectories.  And he was seen stocking up on supplies at various gun stores and asking about how some of them work.  This was highly premeditative. 

However, that doesn't mean it's not that he's crazy.  It just means that he didn't just get really frustrated one day and do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Lushen said:

However, that doesn't mean it's not that he's crazy. 

That's poor reason to just assume that he was "crazy". You don't have to be mentally ill in order to be evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ping said:

That's poor reason to just assume that he was "crazy". You don't have to be mentally ill in order to be evil.

I've said this several times.  I am not saying he is definitively crazy.  I am saying that it is a possibility.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Lushen said:

I've said this several times.  I am not saying he is definitively crazy.  I am saying that it is a possibility.  

Which mental illness would you say he has? Mental illness/crazy is a broad term

i mean I suffer from pretty awful depression and that makes me mentally ill. But I wouldn't shoot up a concert

Edited by Lord Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lushen said:

I've said this several times.  I am not saying he is definitively crazy.  I am saying that it is a possibility.  

I'm not saying he is definitely hired by the GOP. I am saying that it is a possibility.

Actually, no, I'm not saying that either, because it would silly to just throw around wild theories with no factual backing.

Edited by ping
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lord Raven said:

Which mental illness would you say he has? Mental illness/crazy is a broad term

i mean I suffer from pretty awful depression and that makes me mentally ill. But I wouldn't shoot up a concert

He said his father was "diagnosed with psychopathy" so my guess is he doesn't really know the first thing about mental illness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...