Jump to content

Misconception of Tier Lists


Junkhead
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 9/17/2018 at 4:10 AM, silveraura25 said:

I don't know about Gamepress, but Gamepedia doesn't say they're bad for being rather low in the tier. Eliwood's tier even mentions that he's servicable, just requires investment. Only time that something was considered remotely bad was Odin's special hell which no one occupies anymore. Gamepedia operates on arena performance against common arena defense threats, which are provided by players, along with their common builds. Unit's being tested only face their own and weaker color in the score range of tier 19.5. There are also a bunch of rules such as buffs and chills that you can read about. While he seems to be considered low in his tier list, that's only because of his performance against common threats of his own and weaker color. It doesn't reflect his abilities in PvE content. Which is the case with brave bow archers

True and you are right some units like legendary hector just have an easier time than characters like odin (neither are bad)

Edited by American Hector
It was too short and the moderators didn't like it, sorry I am new
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...